Today we harness strange forces – occult studies, fiction, art and even role-playing – to bring you an exclusive and extended feature on paranormal adventurer Bob Freeman. From folklore and fiction to Tarot and character generation, we dance the Weird Fantastic. And we also get to ask ‘Who is the real Bob Freeman?’
We promised that Edwardian Arcane would explore some of the curious side alleys of the period. Later this month we have articles on female ghost story writers, aerial warfare, and more William Hope Hodgson. This time we hand over to Holmesian author/lecturer S F Bennett, on Louis Wain.
We recently featured James Bojaciuk on the little-known Hope Hodgson artist Florence Briscoe. Our guest today brings us the story of another better-known, but troubled, illustrator active in the period. There’s even a piece of unusual Holmesian art to go with it. Continue reading The Man Who Made Cats Laugh: Louis Wain→
Dark and wonderful times a-coming. Normally this would be on the specific Occult Detective Quarterly pages, but today we’re going to share the full Table of Contents for Issue One and lots of other exciting stuff. Not only was the Kickstarter for ODQ a success, but you may have noticed that we met both of our Stretch Goals. We even went over those targets. It’s a good feeling, and we’re enormously grateful to everyone who pledged, and those who spread the word. This is the time to knuckle down and get the beast into shape – we have an issue to produce, and we’d better talk about that.
The contents of the first issue are pretty much settled, except for the simple question of whether or not we can fit them all in. That may sound odd, but we have page limits which are reflected in print and shipping costs, so any Table of Contents at this stage is subject to the possibility of something having to flow into Issue Two. Things look different when they’re actually put into the final layout and the correct format.
Firstly, a reminder that the ODQ ‘we’ involves no lurchers or other sundry greydogtales personnel. The team is currently:
EDITORS
Sam Gafford and John Linwood Grant
PRINT, PRODUCTION & PUBLISHING CHIEF
Travis Neisler
CONSULTING EDITOR
Dave Brzeski
Dave Brzeski from the UK, who has extensive experience in editing and reviewing (amongst other things), is a welcome addition to the team, with a particular role in assessing submissions. We also have a small number of readers who assist us, and who have been invaluable.
So here’s what you can expect from us, along with the allocation of artists to writers…
Issue One Contents
Cover illustration by Terry Pavlet; logo by Bob Freeman
DON’T SAY I DIDN’T WARN YOU – Fiction by Adrian Cole
WHEN SOFT VOICES DIE – Fiction by Amanda DeWees; iIllustrated by Bob Freeman
MONOCHROME – Fiction (novelette) by Ted E Grau; illustrated by Dave Felton
GOT MY MOJO RISING – Fiction by Willie Meikle & David T Wilbanks; illustrated by M Wayne Miller
ORBIS TERTIUS – Fiction by Joshua M Reynolds; illustrated by Mutartis Boswell
THE BARON OF BOURBON STREET – Fiction by Aaron Vlek
THE ADVENTURE OF THE BLACK DOG– Fiction by Oscar Dowson
Plus these special features, exclusive to ODQ:
The Occult Legion Part 1 – Fiction by multiple authors (to be revealed)
Dr Spector, and AnInterview with Don Glut – Articles by Charles R Rutledge
How to be a Victorian Ghost Hunter – Article byTim Prasil
Reviews by Dave Brzeski & James Bojaciuk
All the above, nearly one hundred pages perfect bound for the print edition: that’s a fantastic line-up, and we couldn’t be more pleased with what we’re putting together. That so many talented people would want to play in the ODQ yard gives us confidence that, hey, this wasn’t such a bad idea after all.
Submission News
Our delay with the long-list is due to the experimental nature of launching a new magazine (although we still apologise for not being quicker). It boils down to a number of questions which faced us during September and October, including:
How much interest would there be in the Kickstarter, and how much would it raise?
How much fiction could we fit in Issue One and still afford to ship, given postal rates?
How much artwork were we going to include?
How firm did we want to make the ToCs for Issues Two and Three? Did we want to leave a number of slots for new submissions?
Some of the above have been answered. So we can now scour long and short lists again to firm up longer term plans. By the start of the new year, everyone should be either given a final, sad ‘Sorry, not this time’, or placed on the list for the forthcoming issues.
For those who submitted after the August deadline, which occurred mostly because some secondary sites kindly spread the word but did not include the deadline, all stories are being held for the next round (see Where Next below).
It can’t escape you that we have some stellar art in Issue One. Let’s be honest, we wanted to make a splash. Other artists who contacted us expressing interest, or sharing portfolios, are still on the list for possible inclusion in later issues, and have not been forgotten.
To answer a separate question while we’re here, it is still unlikely that we will accept poetry. We would have to come across an exceptional – and particularly relevant – piece to break that rule.
Issue One in Your Hand
Kickstarter funds will be released some time in the next week or so, which is the usual procedure, and the artists will be hard at work throughout November. Negotiations with our preferred printer and distributor are almost complete. Given the need to edit and layout the accepted fiction and articles (as in the ToC above), and to give the artists time to work their magic, we have to be realistic and expect shipping in December, rather than late November. We’ll be doing our very best to make sure that we ship as soon as possible whilst delivering a high quality product.
After you’ve received Issue One, you should also receive any extra rewards involved. Some, such as signed print copies of books from authors, and titles from the lovely Alchemy Press, may ship separately.
Ebooks will be sent directly from the publishers who so generously supported us – April Moon, Dark Regions, Crystal Lake and 18thWall Productions.
You should also receive a voucher/code entitling you to choose a free ebook from those generous folk at 18thWall Productions, an offer we hadn’t expected when we started, so that’s very cool.
Where next?
We should be re-opening for another submissions round after Issue One has shipped (Update: Opening 1st to 28th February 2017). Other questions remain, more to do with the self-sustaining nature of this sort of enterprise, such as:
It would be nice to make ODQ available on Amazon issue by issue, and give it more exposure. Is this worth it, given the extra work involved and the cut Amazon take? We’re pondering.
Most of our subscribers are in North America, but we know there’s a lot of interest in the UK. Can we find a way to keep shipping costs down, or distribute directly from the UK?
How do we get the word out beyond the current audience and encourage general readers, such as those who like a good mystery, to give ODQ a go?
How do we grapple with our goal of exploring the boundaries of our core theme and standing out in the crowd? Experimental fiction, genre-breaking stories, subversion of the themes and tropes? It’s all open for debate.
What you can do
OK, we’re the ones who have the heavy handling ahead of us. But you can help. You can:
Shiver with excited anticipation;
Buy the journal when it comes out, if you didn’t take part in the Kickstarter;
Participate in the dedicated Facebook Group, discuss occult detectives, psychic investigators and their ilk, raise ideas and ask questions;
Spread the word to friends that terrific fiction and art are on their way, and
Review the journal on goodreads, blogs and other websites when you get it.
Between us, we are ODQ. Thank you.
the hog, copyright m s corley
In case you’re confused now, normal greydogtales nonsense resumes in a day or two, fear not…
We’ve always loved obscure facts, trivia and convoluted connections. So it’s a pleasure to publish something today which outdoes even our own usual delvings. That also means we have to apologise for the distinct lack of lurchers recently. The story so far is that we took on lots of editing, and we need to write to earn money, and… we’ll do better soon. Honest. Django has fleas at the moment, anyway. Where he got them’s a mystery, as he has no pocket-money left, but that should occupy us for a day or two – washing all our manuscripts at a high temperature and so forth.
We do however welcome back James Bojaciuk of 18thWall Productions. Writer editor and publisher, last year he considered the roots and imagery of William Hope Hodgson’s Hog for us. This time he focuses on the little known artist Florence Briscoe, who illustrated Hope Hodgson’s Carnacki stories. And we have the pictures. It’s Edwardian Arcane again!
Florence Briscoe: A Life in Scraps
James Bojaciuk
For every person who leaves behind enough papers, speeches, and letters that their lives can be parlayed into a nine volume history, there are thousands who disappear. They only leave newspaper notices, parish records, certificates, the unavoidable documentation that stalks us all. To piece together one such life is to piece together suppositions.
Florence Briscoe is one such life. Until this article she was only known as the original illustrator for Carnacki: The Ghost-Finder. But, even then, she was little more than a footnote. None of the dozens of editions have carried her illustrations, so far as I’m aware; her work only appears on scattered websites, and has only dimly inspired the general image of the character.
william hope hodgson
Florence’s birth is a mystery; what little we can surmise about her family life can flash us by in a few terse facts. She was born Florence Schulke, sometime in October, 1890. She certainly spent her teenage years in Liverpool, and was likely born there as well. Her family seems to have been Catholic. She married Joseph Briscoe on May twenty-seventh, 1912. She was twenty-two years old. Her handwriting was precise, but adorned with squiggles (I am tempted to write “happy squiggles”). Her occupation, oddly, was listed as “spinster.” But then, Joseph’s profession was nothing more impressive than a “bachelor” who had attained the rank, in this position, of “bachelor.”
At the time of their marriage, Florence and Joseph lived together at 162 Ma—. The handwriting is too imprecise to discern more without an essay’s worth of educated guesses. This is the last address we ever find put to her name, and we can somewhat safely assume (as safely as one can assume without facts) that she remained there the rest of her life.
a younger hope hodgson
It’s tempting to assume that she met Joseph on the way to class, if not in class itself. Beginning several years previously, somewhere between 1908 and 1910, Florence attended a co-ed art school in Clapham. This helps resolve an oddity in the records. At the time of their wedding, the couple had been living at the same address for some time. Even in the Edwardian era, some couples would cohabit prior to the wedding—but that is not the sort of thing even the most daring would write in the church records. But if Florence took up rooms in Clapham, funded by her professional art (more on that to follow), it’s likely that Joseph was either the son of her landlord or a fellow student rooming in the same building. I would wager more on the latter, given they had enough in common to marry, but it’s also difficult to credit an expanding family staying in a student’s apartment for decades. Either “student” or “son of the land lord” would explain why Joseph’s employment is merely “bachelor.” Of course, paperwork regarding later addresses may have been lost.
the king and the girl
While attending art school, she entered her work in contests. We know her for pencil illustrations, but here she expresses a fascination for painted landscapes. She had a talent for it, as well, and took home second place in the 1910 Gilbert-Garret Art Contest (which continues to this day). The first place winner’s landscape has been preserved forever; Florence’s, however, suffers the way all second place winners do. Her work is lost. No-one thought to reproduce it for the papers. All of the winners, however, Florence included, had their art exhibited in South Kensington. This was her last known professional work.
Three years previously, she began working at The Idler. It is here that all of her surviving work was published.
And thus we come to the only reason Florence Briscoe is remembered by the world—her association with an obscure genre’s still yet more obscure character created by an all the more obscure author. We don’t know how she earned placement on the Carnacki series. By the time it began, she had been with The Idler for a few years, and illustrated a few minor series. There’s a distinct possibility that she knew William Hope Hodgson and he recommended her for the job. Then again, there’s the equally distinct possibility that they were assigned to each other (as authors and illustrations so often are), and struck off in friendship. There’s a yet third distinct possibility that they met once, and Florence found Hodgson’s face so unusual she simply had to use it in her professional work. The fact behind these theories: Florence regularly sketched characters after Hodgson’s likeness.
check this against photo at start of article!
Florence had a tendency to reuse a person’s appearance from story to story. A man with a pointed beard and mustache appears in almost every set of illustrations; many of her women appear to be modeled off a single woman (perhaps a self-portrait); and a certain off-used young man is identifiable by his broad chest, worked-out physique, short stature, and rather unique haircut. You may be prepared to cry foul; I would as well, were it not for the fact that this model is drawn remarkably true to life in a single instance, and in that instance the young man is the living image of William Hope Hodgson.
the horse of the invisible
Hodgson appears unmistakably in Florence’s second illustration for “The King’s Cigarette Case.” There is no room for argument. The perspective has thrown off his eyes’ placement, somewhat, but the face and hair are inescapably Hodgson’s. Let us call him the “Hodgson model.”
Knowing Florence’s predilection for reusing models—and never bothering to alter their features from story to story—we find Hodgson throughout her illustrations, standing out due to his striking face and unusual body-type. Though in one instance the “Hodgson model” wears a mustache (“Lord Ernest’s Trap”), the rest of his design is unmistakable.
lord ernest’s trap
We can take this one step further. It is my contention that Florence based Carnacki’s appearance on Hodgson. He shares in many of the general attributes Florence ascribed the “Hodgson model.”
gateway of the monster
It is perhaps an unprovable contention, like proving the Rorschach shows what you see. Before we begin, let one thing be said: Carnacki is inescapably linked with a mustache. He and it are inseparable. Find any artist who has drawn the ghost-finder; the character’s face is graced with a mustache. There is one problem. Carnacki was neither described—nor drawn—with any facial hair. So far as I can tell, this portrayal began when a low-resolution version of Florence’s header found its way online in the early days of the internet. What was a shadow, thanks to pixilation, became a mustache. Without any of Florence’s other illustrations at hand, the idea of a mustachioed Carnacki flourished.
note lack of moustache
Carnacki illustrations share in the same aspects as the Hodgson model. He has the same unique haircut seen in photographs of Hodgson. He has the same short, stocky strength-trainer’s build. In most of the illustrations, he shares his author’s nose, chin, and eyes.
If this identification is accepted, it throws significant light onto Hodgson. First, much can be made of the fact he allowed his character to resemble him. Second, we possess art of Hodgson that was apparently drawn from life. Our picture of him expands. All of this due to Florence’s skill, and her reliance on a handful of models.
To return to Florence: the most striking thing about The Idler, as one combs through its back issues a century later, is how many women illustrated its stories. Male artists are rare, and almost absent. As much as some may like to present Edwardian women imprisoned within their homes—making a single career, as Florence did, was hardly unusual.
Artistically, Florence was far above most—truthfully, all—of the artists working alongside her at The Idler. Her work has an excellent command of shadows, and her characters have that rare spark of light. Unlike many artists from her era, her crosshatching is only present to draw the eye, and her shadows are controlled. Readers who have only seen her Carnacki illustrations have not seen her full range. Those pieces of art are more controlled, and lean more toward darkness—a style well-fitted to ghosts, but not a style which has not aged nearly so well as the remainder of her illustrations, given Edwardian printing and the unkindness of digital conversion. Her Carnacki illustrations are muddy, now, and occasionally illegible.
If she enters the historical record with Carnacki, she departs with him as well. When the series ended at The Idler, so too did her employment. An imaginative “historian” can devise any number of reasons why she might. A historian can only shrug. All that remains on record of Florence Briscoe can be discussed in a matter of paragraphs.
On the twenty-first of March, 1921, Florence witnessed the marriage of her sister Matilda to Seth Hellen.
At a time unknown, Florence and Joseph had a son, Gerald. On December twentieth, 1959, Gerald married Helen Vassallo in St. Patrick’s Church, Sliema. St. Patrick’s of Sliema is not an ordinary church, however, and almost exclusively catered to British servicemen. It seems likely Gerald served in the British armed forces, and possibly in World War Two.
Try as I might, I have uncovered no death certificate. My attempts to track down her family have begun where they started. Florence’s story, as with so much involving early weird fiction, ends in a question mark.
The weekend will bring new delights, but what they are we do not know as yet…